Summary : The purpose of this study was to estimate the net financial benefit or cost of implementing electronic medical record systems in primary care.
Much of the data and conclusions are based on expert opinion and assumptions, with a minority of data from actual studies. We performed a cost-benefit study to analyze the financial effects of electronic medical record systems in ambulatory primary care settings from the perspective of the health care organization. The reference strategy for comparisons was the traditional paper-based medical record. Benefits accrue primarily from savings in drug expenditures, improved utilization of radiology tests, better capture of charges, and decreased billing errors.
Implementation of an electronic medical record system in primary care can result in a positive financial return on investment to the health care organization. Summary : Delivery of excellent primary care? This paper, developed by the National Alliance for Primary Care Informatics, a collaborative group sponsored by a number of primary care societies, argues that providers' and patients' information and decision support needs can be satisfied only if primary care providers use electronic medical records EMRs.
Although robust EMRs are now available, only about 5 percent of U. Recently, with only modest investments, Australia, New Zealand, and England have achieved major breakthroughs in implementing EMRs in primary care.
Substantial benefits realizable through routine use of EMRs include improved quality, safety, and efficiency, along with increased ability to conduct education and research. Nevertheless, barriers to adoption exist and must be overcome. Summary : Advances in information technology and recent national directives have the potential to support dramatic improvements in health care.
Two key components are the implementation of functional electronic health record EHR systems and widely accepted, evidence-based clinical performance measures for physicians. Midwest Heart Specialists, a physician cardiovascular group at 14 locations in northern Illinois, has utilized an outpatient electronic health record HER system since Since , the group has integrated cardiovascular measurement sets developed by the American Medical Association-convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement into its EHR system.
With this integration, the group was able to capture data needed for internal quality assessment and improvement as part of routine outpatient care without the need for additional resources. Critical disease-management data for decision support are available continuously, resulting in improvements in health care.
The reporting of these standardized data could be the foundation to support quality-based reimbursement strategies and physician office-based, disease-management strategies.
Summary : This article identifies the three major do's and don'ts of electronic health record EHR system implementation and explores the application of these components. The author characterizes these areas as "the three T's": team, tactics, and technology.
Each EHR implementation team should have a physician champion who motivates others, a skilled and collaborative project manager, broad stakeholder involvement, and specific, measurable goals. Tactics to employ for a successful implementation include: design a balanced scanning strategy, utilize a phased implementation, lighten workloads when going "live" and for a short period afterward, and enter data into the EHR electronically as much as possible.
Havingproper speed and high network availability and capability, maintaining a test environment to mirror the live environment in case of problems, utilizing expert information technology IT advice when it comes to servers and networks, maintaining servers, and having a disaster recovery plan in place are all technology issues to address for successful implementation.
Summary : We surveyed a nationally representative sample of medical group practices to assess their current use of information technology IT. Our results suggest that adoption of electronic health records EHRs is progressing slowly, at least in smaller practices, although a number of group practices plan to implement an EHR within the next 2 years.
Benefits of implementing an EHR include improved access to medical record information, workflow, patient communications, and accuracy for coding evaluation and management procedures.
For those both with and without EHRs, the top five barriers were related to costs and concerns about physicians' support and their ability to use the new system. Overall, the process of choosing and implementing an EHR appears to be more complex and varied than we expected. This suggests a need for greater support for practices, particularly smaller ones, in this quest, if the benefits expected from EHRs are to be realized. Summary : The electronic medical record EMR is an enabling technology that allows physician practices to pursue more powerful quality improvement programs than is possible with paper-based records.
However, achieving quality improvement through EMR use is neither low-cost nor easy. Get daily news updates from Healthcare IT News. Top Story. Epic's director of nursing discusses new research on its sepsis early warning model. Telehealth has grown by leaps at doc practices, with wide variance in usage patterns.
White Papers More Whitepapers. Artificial Intelligence. Better Communication. Better Patient Care. Better Cost Outcomes. Webinars More Webinars. Population Health. Quality and Safety. Healthcare will have to keep pace with majority minority population change.
With a fully functional EHR, your practice is seamlessly integrated with other members of the healthcare community, helping to: Improve coordination of care Increase patient participation in care Improve the quality of patient care Increase efficiencies and cost savings for your practice.
Compared to paper records, a digital patient-record EHR system can add information management tools to help providers provide better care by more efficiently organizing, interpreting, and reacting to data.
EHR software can provide clinical reminder alerts, connect experts for health care decision support, and analyze aggregate data for both care management and research The more interactive an EHR system is, the more it will prompt the user for additional information. This not only helps collect more data but also enhances their completeness.
EHRs are the future of healthcare because they provide critical data that informs clinical decisions, and they help coordinate care between all providers in the healthcare ecosystem. EHR systems focus on the total health of the patient. EHR software is designed to reach out beyond the health organization that originally collects and compiles the information. The information moves with the patient—to the specialist, the hospital, the nursing home, the next state or even across the country.
They are typically much more expensive to implement initially, as providers must invest in the proper hardware, training and support on top of the software. Health information and data. Results management. An EHR lets you receive lab results, radiology reports, and even X-ray images electronically while ensuring tests are not duplicated.
Order entry. No more prescription pads. All your orders are automated using secure e-prescribing technology. Decision support. Offer access to evidence-based tools to support clinical decisions. Electronic communications and connectivity. You can talk in cyberspace with patients, your medical assistant, referring doctors, hospitals, and insurers—securely. Interoperability is the key word as you streamline your workflow by interfacing with other providers, labs, imaging centers, and payers.
Patient support. Engage your patients by allowing to them to receive educational material via the EHR and enter data themselves through online questionnaires and home monitoring devices.
0コメント